Join Our Newsletters
No users online
Guests: 1 |
Gallery
User Panel
Long Lost Michelangelo Sculpture Found?
591
584
583
582
581
580
579
578
577
576
575
574
573
572
571
569
568
567
565
564
563
562
526
525
524
523
522
521
515
514
513
512
484
483
482
481
480
479
478
467
456
455
454
453
452
441
440
439
438
437
431
430
429
428
427
426
425
424
414
413
412
361
360
359
340
339
338
337
336
335
334
333
332
331
330
329
318
317
316
315
314
313
312
311
310
309
308
267
235
233
229
228
227
212
210
202
158
153
152
151
150
149
148
65
64
63
59
58
57
53
52
51
50
49
48
38
37
32
3
2
1
Picture information
Description:
According to Alessandro Vezzosi, director of the Museo Ideale Leonardo Da Vinci and artistic director of the Swedish exhibition, there is no doubt that the sandstone Arrotino is the statue Titi saw in Pisa.
“Titi’s descriptions appear correct, especially when he refers to the grey Gonfolina sandstone. The great stone blocks, which are even mentioned by Leonardo Da Vinci in the Codex Leicester, are found on a stretch of the Arno not far from Florence near the village of Carmignano, and were used since medieval times,” Vezzosi told Discovery News. Completed 15 years after Michelangelo’s death, the Palazzo Lanfranchi was sold by its owners -- without the two sculptures -- in 1827. “The fact that the Lanfranchis decided to the keep the two statues when selling their entire property gives an idea of how valued the sculptures might have been considered," Zisa said. On display in Florence’s Bargello museum until 1888, the sculptures were then moved to the Capannoli Villa near Pisa, and ultimately ended up on the antiquarian market. They currently belong to two separate owners. While the Harpy was attributed to the Mannerist sculptor Tribolo (around 1500 - 1550) and displayed at a few exhibitions, the Lanfranchi Arrotino fell into oblivion. “I think it lost its appeal because it was the copy of a famous Classical sculpture, unlike the Harpy, which featured some iconographic originality. They did not notice that while each detail is faithfully reproduced, the final version of the Arrotino is totally new,” Zisa said. According to Zisa, the sculpture shows great attention to anatomical features, while the touching surfaces adhere as if permeating one another. “Moreover, the cloak wrapped around the right side of the figure may be a correction of the unnatural hanging of the cloth in the original sculpture. It is covered with dense, parallel stripes -- a decorative pattern that can be also found in the cloak of the Lorenzo de’ Medici statue by Michelangelo in the Medici Chapels in Florence,” Zisa said. It is known that Michelangelo may have copied classical statues. According to the artist and art historian Giorgio Vasari (1511 - 1574), the master carved a marble cupid, buried it for a time to make it seem older than it was, and sold it as an ancient sculpture to a dealer. “The relationship between Michelangelo and the classical statuary is very interesting. Further studies are required on the Lanfranchi Arrotino. It certainly deserves to be reevaluated,” Vezzosi said.
Date:
06.07.2010 22:31:05
Hits:
92
Rating:
No Votes
Filesize:
85,08 KB (347 x 400 px)
Author:
File size of the original picture:
33,85 KB (418 x 481 px)
Picture RatingShare this image in Forums (BBcode)
Include image:
Link image:
Send to Friend
Please login first...
|






Comments for this picture
Comments are not shown to unregistered users. Please register